2009-11-01 02:35:20 +09:00
|
|
|
DO NOT "FIX" CODE IN THIS DIRECTORY.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ONLY UPSTREAM VERSIONS OF SOFTWARE GO IN THIS DIRECTORY.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This directory is provided as a courtesy to our users who might be
|
|
|
|
|
unable or unwilling to find and install libraries we depend on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we "fix" software in this directory, we hamstring users who do the
|
|
|
|
|
right thing and keep a single version of upstream libraries in a
|
|
|
|
|
system-wide library. We introduce subtle and maddening bugs where
|
|
|
|
|
our code is "accidentally" using the "wrong" library version. We may
|
|
|
|
|
unwittingly interfere with other software that depends on the
|
|
|
|
|
canonical release versions of those same libraries!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forking upstream software for trivial reasons makes us bad citizens in
|
|
|
|
|
the Open Source community and adds unnecessary heartache for our
|
|
|
|
|
users. Don't make us "that" project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: What should we do when we find a bug in upstream software?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: First and foremost, REPORT THE BUG, and if possible send in a patch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Watch for a release of the upstream software and integrate with it
|
|
|
|
|
when it's released.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the meantime, work around the bug, if at all possible. Usually,
|
|
|
|
|
it's quite possible, if slightly harder or less efficient.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: What if the bug can't be worked around?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: If the upstream developers have accepted a bug patch, it's
|
|
|
|
|
undesirable but acceptable to apply that patch to the library in
|
|
|
|
|
the extlib dir. Ideally, use a release version for upstream or a
|
|
|
|
|
version control system snapshot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that this is a last resort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: What if upstream is unresponsive or won't accept a patch?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: Try again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: I tried again, and upstream is still unresponsive and nobody's
|
|
|
|
|
checked on my patch. Now what?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: If the upstream project is moribund and there's a way to adopt it,
|
|
|
|
|
propose having the StatusNet dev team adopt the project. Or, adopt
|
|
|
|
|
it yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q: What if there's no upstream authority and it can't be adopted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A: Then we fork it. Make a new name and a new version. Include it in
|
2013-09-19 23:11:04 +09:00
|
|
|
lib/ instead of extlib/, and use the GNUSocial_* prefix to change
|
2009-11-01 02:35:20 +09:00
|
|
|
the namespace to avoid collisions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a last resort; consult with the rest of the dev group
|
|
|
|
|
before taking this radical step.
|
