On my test setup, this fixes inbox delivery to 10,000 local recipients from background queuedaemon running with a 32mb memory limit, completes the job within a minute from start.
Pretty much everything in File and File_redirection initial processing needs to be rewritten to be non-awful; this code is very hard to follow and very easy to make huge bugs. A fair amount of the complication is probably obsoleted by the redirection following being built into HTTPClient now.
* Moved notification sending from Notice::saveReplies to distrib queue handler, so it'll pull from the reply set we've saved regardless of how we got it.
* Set up gettext infrastructure for command-line scripts; gets localization mail notifications etc working from background queues.
* Adjusted locale switching: common_switch_locale() works at runtime for bg scripts, forces a message catalog update
Should help with dupes that come in when inbox distrib jobs die and get restarted, etc.
Conflicts:
classes/Inbox.php
Looks like this was implemented on master recently and not copied up to testing. Merging to my version on testing as I've added some doc comments and extracted a couple functions for future ease of use.
to (profile_id, id) instead of (profile_id, created, id).
It's been falling back to PRIMARY instead, which is really
very inefficient for a profile that hasn't posted in a few
months. Even though forcing the index will cause a filesort,
it's usually going to be better. Even for large profiles it
seems much faster than the badly-indexed query.
to (profile_id, id) instead of (profile_id, created, id).
It's been falling back to PRIMARY instead, which is really
very inefficient for a profile that hasn't posted in a few
months. Even though forcing the index will cause a filesort,
it's usually going to be better. Even for large profiles it
seems much faster than the badly-indexed query.
This bug was hitting a number of places where we had the pattern:
$db->find();
while($dbo->fetch()) {
$x = clone($dbo);
// do anything with $x other than storing it in an array
}
The cloned object's destructor would trigger on the second run through the loop, freeing the database result set -- not really what we wanted.
(Loops that stored the clones into an array were fine, since the clones stay in scope in the array longer than the original does.)
Detaching the database result from the clone lets us work with its data without interfering with the rest of the query.
In the unlikely even that somebody is making clones in the middle of a query, then trying to continue the query with the clone instead of the original object, well they're gonna be broken now.
